DesertLight Journal

Latest Entries

The DLJ Goes Dark

11-26-06 3:45 A GMT-07

This will be my last post here at the DLJ blog. My decision to discontinue posting here is actually far more positive than it may seem. That’s because my current situation will allow me to focus on the thing that got me into activism and publishing the DLJ in the first place.

There are others who are quite ably covering the issues, such as Teri Stoddard, Wendy McElroy, and of course, Men’s News Daily and Mensactivism

The hundreds of good people all over the world I’ve met in the years since the DLJ was first launched (in 2001 as an e-mailed newsletter) have all taught me a lot, and given me the tools which I can use to effectively run a program that provides practical help for a group of people that sorely need it.

There are far too many of those who’ve helped along the way to list by name but my gratitude for each and every one of you is boundless.

I will be focusing my efforts on setting up a program for abused men in my local area of Yuma, Arizona. Under the auspices of the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women, I will establish first an online presence, (at least part of that will be a blog here at Blog-City)  and then an in-person peer counseling group. We’ll see where it goes from there.

Otherwise, about six weeks ago, I launched a blog on cooking, the Elementary Chef, and just yesterday was asked to contribute material to Dean’s World, which is much more widely-read than the DLJ ever was. On Dean’s World I’ll be chronicling my efforts to get my abused men’s program up and running, as well as other things that present themselves.

Happy trails!

Renew! Redocorate! Rework!

08-16-06 9:12 A GMT-07

I've got a couple of book projects that need finishing, one of which is a resource manual for DAHM.  As you know, things are changing rapidly, as evidenced by these stories:

Wife charged with murder

Wife of former Seahawk Chad Eaton arrested

I'm also going to be doing some re-working of the blog, as Blog City has upgraded to a new version.

I have to say something here…

08-11-06 11:59 P GMT-07

There is yet another hunger strike by a disenfranchised father going on. I have been asked to support this action, and have ignored all requests.

That’s because this particular strategy has been proven wrong, not only by many good Irishmen in 1981 who might now be more concerned with the antics of their grandchildren had they lived. Also by a disenfranchised father I knew for some time.

His name was Len Miskulin. You will not remember him, since his work and his quest was to no avail. All that happened with Len was that he lost his kids, and lost his health.

He hung on for some 53 days, if memory serves. He had some publicity for a time, since he was the first; at least in the UK. He came out of it so damaged he told me if he’d known how bad it was he’d try something else.

It’s been about five years, and I’ve lost track, but if I could find him and drag Len here to the US, I’m sure he’d tell anyone trying this radical stunt to STOP!!!

Today there are far more effective ways to influence public opinion. On a personal level, the reality is that this kind of stunt only causes harm. You might get a couple of media mentions, but the truth is nobody today wants to hear about divorced men acting so irresponsibly they can’t even consider their own health.

That’s the way it plays.

Why on Earth would any court want to allow a man with so little concern for life to be the custodian of his children?

How does this make any sense???

It really doesn’t.

I know I got a lot of extremely angry and barely coherent e-mails from a guy. I remember asking a perfectly civil question, and he came back with nonsense. I was supposed to buy his full package without question.

Gentlemen, there are so many fucking loose cannons in this movement I despair of ever being able to make positive gain.

Now there are claimed anti-feminists supporting insanity, I have no idea what to think.

The mothers and wives of the 1981 Irish protestors had no benefits. Nowt but the body comin out after death.

Dave Winer is Right About Sexism

08-11-06 2:43 A GMT-07

Like a lot of other things, he's right about this, too.

Maybe I assign too much wonderfulness to this guy, but he was my blogfather in actuality. One day in early 2003, a media newsletter I got had a reference to Scripting News. Being a non-programmer myself, i wondered why it was this kind of deep geek lore merited a place among media references.

So I went, and read, and drank that particular Kool-aid. I've been a blogger ever since.

Entirely separate from anything Dave has ever done, I used my blog to work for men's rights, father's rights, and the most important : unserved victims of domestic violence. These were things I'd already been working on. I just used the blog to go further.

Even though we've exchanged a few e-mails over time, he still isn't quite sure who I am. That's OK, I really can't expect somebody who likely gets hundreds of real e-mails every day to focus on one quirky lady.

Yesterday he said this:

Men know what we have to do, we've had it drilled into us for at least a generation. But there's a long to-do-list for women, and because men have been forced into silence on this subject, that list hasn't had a chance to develop. Liz, it's time to bend over backwards to create safety for men to speak on this subject. Many of your colleagues are already doing this. There are still a few standouts, and you are one of them. No more gender-bashing, lecturing and name-calling, and no more tolerance for that. I will consider what you have said. Now it would be great if you would do the same.

The man understands the ideals of equality, and expects women to do the same. He is far more diplomatic and decent than I would be in the same situation.

As a woman of education and influence, I feel diminished and insulted by events such as BlogHer, because that is precisely what they are designed to do. They have been created in order to congregate angry women who feel the rules of society don't apply to them, add fuel to their discomfiture, and eventually verify their paranoid fears of an oppressive patriarchy.

They are certainly divisive. Feminism has always been about division, and disdain for those who will not believe. I wish those otherwise-intelligent, and decent women who have bought that mess of pottage that feminism really is would recognize that it's time to stop hating, time to stop blaming, and most important : time to stop setting women up as any kind of special class of anything!

...and let the rest of us live our lives with our men in peace.

There's a quite easy test to apply: if you think something said about a man is funny, try replacing a woman in there. If you think it's hateful when applied to a woman -- bingo! It's sexist.

I'm old enough to know that there are far more bad, hateful things being said about men today then there ever were said about women in the last forty years.

Nobody has any right to diss an entire class of people. Nor to make any presumptions about them.

I thank God that Dave Winer had the cojones to bring it up.

Storyblogging Carnival Needs Help

08-11-06 1:42 A GMT-07

Doc Rampage reports that only one entry was sent this time. That's not nearly enough! c'mon, kids, put on your writing boots and compose!

Remember, a short story can be as little as 500 words. That's called flash fiction. Everything does NOT hafta be a 30,000 word Heinlein piece.

Send here;

Dave Gudeman
http://docrampage.blogspot.com/

 

Category: Writing

Real-world Thoughts on Valentines Day

posted 02-15-05

Commentary from Trudy W. Schuett --

There were a lot of Valentine’s Day stories in the news. I didn’t get to most of them because at our house, Valentine’s Day is the big day when we do something cool and fantastic to remind each other that this is a loving family, and it’s just as nice to do something for somebody else as it is to get something good.

This is the way I explained it to my then-preschool son, Sean, twenty years ago. That Valentine’s Day times were tough, money was short, the weather was bad, Daddy and Mom were hardly speaking, and yet somehow, Mom figured out how to make Daddy a Valentine anyway. I remember that day pretty clearly – we had a house in Detroit with a basement and an upstairs, and I spent a lot of time bouncing up and down stairs looking for red fabric, red yarn, red anything, or maybe some lace stuff off a shirt from the Halloween closet. I was going to make a Valentine out of whatever we had, by golly. I didn’t have any money , and besides there was two feet of snow on the ground that year.

I gritted my teeth in anger while knitting part of the Valentine, I know, and all day I kept asking myself why I was even bothering to do this. In those days all my husband did was going to work, and then coming home long after Sean was in bed. Weekends sometimes we never saw him at all, when he was out doing extra jobs or maybe hanging out with his friends. We weren’t talking much, so who knew?

We had this nascent tradition, if such a thing is possible, anyway. Long before we were a married couple with a baby, we had silly, funny, things associated with the big day. When we were dating, Paul made a heart-shaped pizza by just getting a regular pizza and carving it out, and eating the evidence. He didn’t realize he was being watched by a couple of my girl pals who happened to be in-house at the time…

Hey, remember this was 1973!

We still had romance then.

Even sans Dad, in the troubled times, Sean and I started to do things for Valentine’s Day. We figured out how make practically anything we cooked heart-shaped, spurred on by our little boy back then wanting to do things to make Daddy happy. I thought my husband was unreachable, but Sean always wanted to make a heart-shaped cooky, a heart-shaped bagel, or whatever we were making that day.

I said why not.

Even if the parents weren’t on the best of terms, there wasn’t any reason why a boy couldn’t let his dad know he loved him. There is something special between a man and his children that has nothing to do with the marriage relationship. It’s true the other way, as well. Mothers have a different relationship with their children.

I knew this, and so I helped my little boy make hearts out of such silly stuff as carrots and cookies , even when the situation between myself and my husband was terrible. No matter what the situation was between myself and my husband, as an adult it was my responsibility to see that the rift in the marriage did not effect our child.

As things worked out, we weathered the storm, and now have celebrated our 30th anniversary. This is not and should not ever be anything unusual. Many of the couples of my generation have done the same. Nearly all of my parent’s generation did. My own parents were married for 61 years, separated only when my mother passed in 1993.

Marriage is about a long term commitment to helping each other, man and woman, through all the crap that happens. It is not about having your needs met, it is not about quality time. It is not about validating yourself as anything from crop duster to mother.

It is about caring enough for yourself and another human being to teach yourself to trust the process. Learning anything is quite difficult; even something like a class in conversational Spanish is going to be beyond the limits for some. Yet if you are in a marriage, no matter how you got there, be it from a quickie ceremony in Las Vegas when you were stoned beyond reason, to a full-boat ritual in church or shul with all the trappings – it’s still about taking care of each other through everything.

Marriage is not a vehicle. It is not a means to an end. The only thing that happens after you say, “I do,” is that now you are responsible for the other person, in terms of doing the best you can to make their life better and more secure.

When you have done the best you can and learn to honestly consider your spouse’s needs, then you most likely will have one of those long-term marriages. If considering another’s needs is too difficult for you, then please don’t bother. Marriage is not for wimps.

If you’re looking to dissolve your marriage because you’re miserable and nothing seems to be working, I want to warn you. The solutions offered by society today are far worse than any marriage. Your children, if any, will no longer be your own. Their fate is decided by the state once you file for divorce. There will be times you have little or no say in what happens to them.

In fact, you will have little or no say in what happens to you, once you give your  marriage over to the government.

People don’t realize what is actually happening in a divorce. The laws are now so invasive that the people choosing to dissolve a marriage have very little control over what happens to their lives after that initial filing. You can’t ever get it back, either.

I’m willing to bet that most often, dear Brianna or Tiffany really aren’t out to destroy the children or the neglectful husband. Despite the number of times you’ve been told how liberating and empowering divorce is, the actual fact is that it sucks big time.

Nobody actually ever gets over it. You will never be at peace with the decision.

I can say that because I had one of the first no-fault divorces. My ex and I went to court and went to lunch after, in a totally equitable intention. He paid the costs because he knew I wouldn’t have the money. I didn’t ask for any money or anything from him, because that’s not the way the new idea of “feminism “ was supposed to be.

Back then, a woman choosing divorce also expected to take on the full responsibility of supporting herself and her children.  How hard is that to understand?

I have always regretted my divorce, mostly because my son from my later marriage is possibly smarter than my first husband. Which would take some doing! These guys need to get together!

Steven Silberberg, are you out there?