We don’t bother going to the theatre to see first-run films anymore, so there’s really not much point in watching the Oscar show either. So not having seen any of the films, I can’t comment on them specifically one way or another, but I was struck yesterday by the Monday morning quarterbacking.
Every year there’s a few people who are disappointed their favorite didn’t win, and now it’s got to the point where political motivations and social consciousness (or lack of it) are being blamed.
Hollywood is tired of being the whipping boy of Karl Rove and the religious right. From articles in the trade press, it appears that very many Academy members voted for "Crash" -- even while believing "Brokeback" was the superior film -- simply because we're all tired of the culture wars, and of the demonization of Hollywood in red states and closeted suburbs throughout the land.
So, a politically astute vote? Probably. Was it fair? Did the vote serve and honor great art? Probably not.
These are sorry times we live in, where fear and intolerance rule the day.
So now it’s Karl Rove’s fault (and by association, President Bush) being blamed for the Oscar vote, too.
I’m sure a lot of people are tired of the culture wars, and not just in Hollywood. But why is it that by purchasing a movie ticket, you are now also expected to buy a political philosophy? Is it really about “fear and intolerance,” or is it more about wishing there was some actual entertainment on the screen?
Hollywood was once about escapism – glamour and suspense, or comedy and a good time. There was magic in the ability to transport people from the reality of their lives to a different world, where the “important” stuff didn’t matter.
Today, though, it seems like it’s more about choosing your cause, than choosing your diversion. And that’s not entertainment!