By KRISTIAN GOVE 03/17/2005 - The Standard Times
A new bill in the General Assembly designed to keep domestic violence victims safer, might also keep their voting records from public view.
The legislation before the Assembly seeks to hide the addresses of domestic violence and/or hate crime victims for voting and other state-related purposes. The act, introduced by Warwick/Cranston State Sen. Elizabeth H. Roberts (D-Dist. 28), aims to keep the addresses of victims confidential, which could theoretically keep their assailants from repeating an offense.
According to the bill (S-919), many victims change addresses frequently to keep their assailants from learning where they live.
The Standard-Times asked its local senators and representatives from North Kingstown and Exeter what they thought the bill. Here is what they said:
Rep. Laurence W. Ehrhardt (R - Dist. 32), said, "I don't think there's really much there. I'm skeptical about the need or feasibility."
State Sen. J. Michael Lenihan (D - Dist. 35) said that his first concern was that the decision of whether or not withhold addresses of victims would rest with the secretary of state's office, and not with the court.
Lenihan said that he was not as concerned about the potential for voter fraud, because the numbers of victims that would be withheld would not adversely affect votes.
"I would like to listen to testimony first," Lenihan said. He said he wants to hear statistics of victims who had had issues in the past with their addresses being made public.
Rep. Kenneth Carter (D - Dist. 31) said that he had not yet seen the bill, and added that Roberts usually has good bills but, "If we start eliminating phone numbers and addresses, how are we going to run good government?"
Carter added that he thought that though the intent of the bill was good, he does not necessarily agree with the method.
"I'm sure she [Roberts] has good reasons, but I think there's going to be a problem getting it passed," Carter said.
The Standard-Times was unable to speak with Rep. Donald J. Lally (D-Dist. 33) and State Sen. James C. Sheehan (D-Dist. 36) before press time.
Exeter General Assembly members had this to say:
State Sen. Kevin Breene (R-Dist. 34) said it was the first time he had heard of the bill.
"In general, I would probably be supportive of it," said Breene. "I haven't read the bill. I'd like to read it and hear some testimony. I can understand where people are being harassed and they are trying to protect their identity, so whoever is harassing them can't just get on the Internet and find out where they live."
Breene added that he felt bad for victims of domestic violence but that "people go to extremes in both directions. I just want to be sure it's fair to everybody."
Rep. Joseph Scott (R-Dist. 39) said, being a lawyer, he has a different perspective from many people.
"I think there's a little too much information out there about people," said Scott. "You can go online and there's no privacy. Any of these bills that create privacy, I'm all for."
If passed, the bill would take effect January 1, 2006.
With reports from Marilyn Bellemore.